{"id":310,"date":"2017-08-14T14:41:01","date_gmt":"2017-08-14T18:41:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/?page_id=310"},"modified":"2021-08-05T11:57:53","modified_gmt":"2021-08-05T15:57:53","slug":"gordon-and-betty-moore-foundation-project-data","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/gordon-and-betty-moore-foundation-project-data\/","title":{"rendered":"GBMF Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\t<h1>Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Project Data<\/h1>\n\t<h2><b>Microscale mechanistic linkages between the chemical and physical processes that contribute to marine organic matter degradation. 2015 &#8211; present.<\/b><\/h2>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-0\">Abstract<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-0\"><i>Collapse<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t\n<p>Particulate organic matter (POM) is ubiquitous in marine systems, and its role in the global carbon cycle is defined by microscale interactions between POM and microbes (Jackson, 1989; Azam, 1998; Jackson and Burd, 2002; Malfatti and Azam, 2009; Stocker, 2012). Microbial degradation drives the turnover of the entire reservoir of suspended POM in the surface ocean, which is composed primarily of living or recently dead plankton, on the timescale of every few weeks (IPCC, 2013). The suspended POM that escapes microbial degradation, forms aggregates (<em>e.g.<\/em>, marine snow or fecal pellets), and sinks, is the primary vector of carbon from the surface ocean to the deep ocean (&#8216;biological pump&#8217;).\u00a0 However, microbial degradation attenuates this flux as particles sink through the deep sea (Knauer et al., 1979; Martin, 1987; Van Mooy et al., 2002; Buesseler et al., 2007). Since the reservoir of carbon in the surface ocean is in near equilibrium with the CO<sub>2<\/sub> in the atmosphere, the activity of microbes on sinking POM is a primary control on Earth&#8217;s climate (Kwon et al., 2009).<\/p>\n<p>Owing to the importance of POM in the marine carbon cycle, POM degradation has been the focus of intense study since the dawn of modern oceanography, and yet this research has yielded very little mechanistic understanding of the microscale chemical and physical interactions underpinning POM degradation. Instead, most work has focused on characterizing POM composition and POM-microbe interactions at the bulk level. For example, bulk transformations in the chemical composition of sinking POM are characterized by a disappearance of readily hydrolysable organic matter, which contributes to the attenuation of the vertical POM flux (Wakeham et al., 1997; Armstrong et al., 2002; Van Mooy et al., 2002; Goutx et al., 2007). Similarly, it is understood that microbes physically interact with sinking POM by encountering particles by Brownian motion or motility, which contributes to dissolution and disaggregation of sinking POM and attenuates flux (Jackson, 1989; Burd et al., 2010). These are among the many bulk chemical and physical effects on POM flux attenuation that have found their way into simple particle export models, and yet the skill of these models is largely insufficient to obtain the predictive value required for inclusion in global climate and carbon biogeochemistry models.<\/p>\n<p>We posit that developing an understanding of the mechanistic linkages between the microscale chemical and physical processes that contribute to POM degradation is critical to improve models of the marine carbon cycle.<\/p>\n<p>We propose a pilot-scale study that couples Van Mooy&#8217;s recent work on understanding chemically mediated microscale connections between POM and microbes (Hmelo et al., 2011; Van Mooy et al., 2012; Edwards et al., 2015) with Stocker&#8217;s recent work on physical interactions between microbes and individual particles at the microscale (Seymour et al., 2010; Stocker, 2012).<\/p>\n<p>Our goal for this proposed research is to establish relationships between the molecular signatures and microbial mechanisms of POM degradation at the scale of an individual particle. The long-term ambition is to be able to use observations of the molecular composition of sinking POM in the ocean to inform mechanistic models of particle flux attenuation. Our recent work has shown that the chemical composition of sinking POM directly influences flux attenuation through its effects on microbial interactions (Edwards et al., 2015), but we still lack the mechanistic context to establish predictive links to microscale physics behind these interactions.<\/p>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-1\">Van Mooy Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-1\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t\n<p>Running Title: Single Particle Lipidomics<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan E. Hunter1*, Helen F. Fredricks1, Lars Behrendt2\u2020, Uria Alcolombri2, Shavonna M. Bent1, Roman Stocker2 and Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy1\u2021.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1050, United States of America.<\/li>\n<li>Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Z\u00fcrich, 8093, Switzerland.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>* Current affiliation: Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, 13 Cambridgeshire, CB7 5WW, United Kingdom<\/p>\n<p>\u2020 Current affiliation: Department of Organismal Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Norbyv\u00e4gen 18A, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Sinking particulate organic matter (POM) is a primary component of the ocean&#8217;s biological carbon pump that is responsible for carbon export from the surface- to the deep-sea. Lipids derived from plankton compose a significant fraction of sinking POM. Our understanding of planktonic lipid biosynthesis and the subsequent degradation of lipids in sinking POM is based on the analysis of bulk samples that combine many millions of plankton cells or dozens of sinking particles, which averages out natural heterogeneity. We developed and applied a nanoflow- ultrahigh-performance liquid-chromatography electrospray-ionization high-resolution accurate-mass mass spectrometry lipidomic method to show that two types of sinking particles &#8211; marine snow and fecal pellets &#8211; collected in the western North Atlantic Ocean have distinct lipidomes, providing new insights on their sources and degradation that would not be apparent from bulk samples. We pressed the limit of this approach by examining individual diatom cells from a single culture, finding marked lipid heterogeneity, possibly indicative of fundamental mechanisms underlying cell division. These single-cell data affirm that even cultures of phytoplankton cells should be viewed as mixtures of physiologically distinct populations. Overall, this work reveals previously-hidden lipidomic heterogeneity in natural POM and phytoplankton cells, which may provide critical new insights on microscale chemical and microbial processes that control the export of sinking POM.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n<p>Lipidomics, ocean, carbon export flux, particulate organic matter, marine snow, aggregate, fecal pellet, phytoplankton, single-cell, nano-flow<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2021\/07\/Summary-of-single-cell-analyses.xlsx\">Summary of single cell analyses<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"ftp:\/\/ftp.whoi.edu\/pub\/science\/MCG\/gbmf\/VanMooy\/2021Single_Cell_analyses\">Raw data files for single cell analyses<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2021\/07\/Summary-of-single-particle-analyses.xlsx\">Summary of single particle analyses<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"ftp:\/\/ftp.whoi.edu\/pub\/science\/MCG\/gbmf\/VanMooy\/2021Single_Particle_analyses\">Raw data files for single particle analyses<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n<p><i>T. weissflogii strain<\/i> CCMP1010 was acquired from the NCMA culture collection (East Boothbay, MI, U.S.A.). Cultures were grown in L1+Si enrichment media based on sterile filtered and autoclaved Sargasso seawater.<\/p>\n\n<p>Nano ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (nUHPLC) separation of marine lipids was carried out with a Thermo Scientific Easy nLC 1200 system. The flow path consisted of a Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap 100 75 \u00b5m x 2 cm, C18 guard column, 3 \u00b5m, 100 \u00c5 and a Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap RSLC 75 \u00b5m x 15 cm, C18 analytical column, 2\u00b5m, 100\u00c5 housed in a Phoenix S&amp;T PST-BPH-20 20 cm butterfly column heater maintained at a constant 50 \u00b0C.<\/p>\n<p>Eluents were comprised as follows: Eluent A &#8211; 75% Water, 25% Acetonitrile, 0.1% Formic Acid, 0.04% NH4OH; Eluent B &#8211; 75% Isopropanol, 25% Acetonitrile, 0.1% Formic Acid, 0.04% NH4OH. The strong needle wash solvent was pure Isopropanol, the loading solvent and weak wash solvent was: 95% Water, 5% Acetonitrile, 0.1% Formic Acid. Finally, samples were dissolved prior to analysis in 50% H2O, 50% Isopropanol. The chromatographic gradient profile, at a constant flow rate of 300 nL min-1, is available upon request.<\/p>\n<p>The nUHPLC system was coupled to a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer via a Thermo Scientific Nanospray Flex source and stainless steel emitter tip. Nanospray source conditions are available upon request. Mass spectrometry conditions are available upon request. Data processing, feature extraction and annotation was performed using the LOBSTAHS package (Collins et al., 2016. <i>Analytical Chemistry<\/i>).<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2018\/09\/Summary-of-Lipid-Oil-Data.xlsx\">Summary of Lipid Oil Data.xlsx<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/data\/nLCQE_00709.raw\">.raw file (nLCQE_00709) (883MB)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/data\/nLCQE_00717.raw\">.raw file (nLCQE_00717) (884MB)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/data\/nLCQE_00723.raw\">.raw file (nLCQE_00723) (922MB)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-2\">Stocker Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-2\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t\n<p>Oil droplets of approximately 1 nL were placed in 2 mL glass vials. \u00a0A culture of <i>Roseobacteria sp<\/i>. incapable of degrading oil was added to the vial. \u00a0The chlorophyll autofluorescence of the oil droplet we then monitored over the course of approximately 2 hours at 20x magnification on a Zeiss microscope using a Cy5 eplifluorescence cube (Ex: 640\/30, 660 LP, Em: 690\/50).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2018\/09\/Oil-droplet-video-1.mp4\">Oil droplet video.mp4<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-3\">OLD <\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-3\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>Lipid Oil, Selected Strains,\u00a036h Time Course<\/h3>\n\n<strong>11\/02\/2017<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>JEH\/WHOI\/027 &#8211; Lipid Oil, Selected Strains, 36h Time Course<\/strong><br \/>\nThis experiment was a follow up from the JEH\/WHOI\/026 experiment. Strains 15 and 03 were\u00a0used as a &#8220;degrader&#8221; and &#8220;non-degrader&#8221; bacteria respectively. These were applied in a\u00a0degradation time course to get time resolved data, capture kinetics and any non-linear dynamics.\n<strong>Z\u00fcrich Experimental Notes<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Experimental notes 18\/10\/17-Strain 15 and 03 kinetics experiment over 36h<\/strong>\n<strong>Oil dispensation<\/strong><br \/>\n3.4 mg of oil was diluted in 340 ul DCM. This was done using a glass syringe with a puncturing\u00a0needle at the end. The solution was vortexed for 30-40s in order to dissolve some of the\u00a0&#039;chunkier pieces of oil. The oil was hereafter dispensed using the pico-pump, a 100 uL glass\u00a0syringe filled with diH2O, connected via tygon tubing to a 5 uL PCR capillary. For filling this\u00a0setup was set into withdrawal mode and 5 uL of oil was taken out of the stock-vial. Dispensation\u00a0was done using a infuse rate of 100nl\/sec and a target volume of 100nl.\n<strong>Bacterial growth and dispensation<\/strong><br \/>\nAll three strains were grown in 2216 on the 16\/10\/17 and freshly inoculated on 17\/10\/18 for O\/N\u00a0(3ml 2216 + 100 uL culture). All cells were diluted and starved according to the standard\u00a0protocol (see above). 450 uL f\/2 was added to all vials and 50 uL of the bacterial solution was\u00a0added to all of them.\n<strong>Labelling<\/strong><br \/>\nAll samples imaged on the microscope were labelled in red with information on strain, date and\u00a0replicate. Off-microscope samples were all in black and additionally labelled with &#8216;no imaging&#8217;.<br \/>\n<strong>Experiment start:<\/strong> 18\/10\/17 @ 14:15<br \/>\n<strong>Experiment end:<\/strong> 20\/10\/17 @<br \/>\n<strong>Sampling interval for microscopy:<\/strong> 4.5h\n\n<p>Microscopy was done using a 20X objective with the 1.5X magnifier, resulting in a final\u00a0magnification of 300X. I tried the 40X objective but in the current setup the sample-holder is\u00a0touching the objective (bottom and top row only). Exposure time for Ph2-BF was 30 ms (LED\u00a0intensity 3.0) and 500ms for Cy5 (100% 640nm LED).<\/p>\nT0= 18\/10\/17 @ 13:50<br \/>\nT1=\u00a018\/10\/17 @ 18:50 (t-running: 4:35 h)<br \/>\nT2=\u00a018\/10\/17 @ 23:30\u00a0(t-running: 9:15 h)\n\n<p>T3=\u00a019\/10\/17 @ 04:00 (t-running: 13:45 h)<\/p>\n\nT4=19\/10\/17 @ 08:30\u00a0(t-running: 18:15 h)<br \/>\nT5=\u00a019\/10\/17 @ 13:00 (t-running: 22:45 h)<br \/>\nT6=\u00a019\/10\/17 @ 17:30 (t-running: 27:15 h)<br \/>\nT7=\u00a019\/10\/17 @ 21:55(t-running: 31:40 h)<br \/>\nT8=20\/10\/17 @ 09:00 (t-running: 42:45 h)<br \/>\nT9= 20\/10\/17 @ 14:15\u00a0(t-running: 48:00 h)\nTwo additional off-microscope sampling times at<br \/>\nT2.5= 19\/10\/17 @ 01:30 (labelled on the tubes themselves!)<br \/>\nT3.5 = 19\/10\/17 @ 06:38\u00a0(labelled on the tubes themselves!)\n<strong>Extraction and Sample Prep<\/strong><br \/>\nDNP-PE standard solution was made 40uL in 4000uL MeOH (1\/100 dilution).<br \/>\nBHT stock solution (10x) was made up 40\/4000uL in MeOH.\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2018\/08\/Lipid-extraction-nano-scale-protocol-page-1-1.png\">Lipid Extraction &#8211; nano scale &#8211; protocol pg 1 (PNG file)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2018\/08\/Lipid-extraction-nano-scale-protocol-page-2-1.png\">Lipid Extraction &#8211; nano scale &#8211; protocol pg 2 (PNG file)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/98\/2018\/08\/Lipid-oil-analysis-summary-Jons-Data-for-GBMF-upload-1.xlsx\">Summary of J. Hunter&#8217;s lipid oil analysis data (Excel file)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\t<h2>Exploring the consequences of microbial communication bloom dynamics and nutrient cycling in the North Atlantic Ocean.<\/h2>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-0\">Van Mooy Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-0\"><i>Collapse<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>DYEatom Cruise<\/h3>\n<strong>Enzyme hydrolysis rates from DYEatom cruise (R\/V Pt. Sur; June 27 to\u00a0 July 5, 2013)<\/strong>&lt;<br \/>\nAuthor: Bethanie Edwards<br \/>\nPosting Date: April 1, 2014<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=180764&amp;pt=2&amp;p=191289\">Excel file<\/a>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Oxylipin and Lipid analysis<\/h3>\n\n\n<p>Total lipid extract obtained following a modified Bligh &amp; Dyer protocol. BHT (butylated hydroxyl toluene) added as an antioxidant, DNP-PE added as an internal std (dinitrophenylphosphatidylethanolamine, Avanti polar lipids).<\/p>\n\n<p>Analyzed on Thermo Exactive plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (electrospray ionization) coupled to an Agilent 1200 HPLC. Chromatography follows Hummel et al. (2011 Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Plant Lipids. <em>Front. Plant Sci.<\/em> 2: 54. Doi:10.3389\/fpls.2011.00054).<\/p>\n<p>Raw data is presented as .raw files from Xcalibur 2.2 software (Thermo). Conversion utilities are available on the web which will convert .raw files to a more accessible format like .mzXML<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Quantitative:<\/strong> &#8220;big 9&#8221; lipids on Thermo TSQ Vantage triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Electrospray ionization, chromatography &#8211; normal phase on a diol column as published in <em>Lipids<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p>Reference: Popendorf, K.J., Fredricks, H.F., and Van Mooy, B.A.S.\u00a0(2013) Molecular-ion independent quantitation of intact polar diacylglycerolipids in marine plankton using triple quadrupole MS. <em>Lipids <\/em><strong>48<\/strong>: 185-195; <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/s11745-012-3748-0\">doi:10.1007\/s11745-012-3748-0<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Qualitative:<\/strong> Samples run on Thermo LCQ Fleet. An ion-trap mass spectrometer that provides low-resolution MS and MS\/SM data and both positive and negative ion modes. HPLC as above.<\/p>\n<p>Reference: Van Mooy, B.A.S., Fredricks, H.F. (2010). Bacterial and eukaryotic intact polar lipids in the eastern subtropical South Pacific: Water-column distribution, planktonic sources, and fatty acid composition. <em>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta<\/em>, <strong>74<\/strong> (22): 6499-6516; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0016703710004758\">DOI: 10.1016\/j.gca.2010.08.026<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Data custodians:<\/p>\n<p>Experiments 1-5 Helen Fredricks (<a href=\"mailto:hfredricks@whoi.edu\">hfredricks@whoi.edu<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Experiments 6-7 Bethanie Edwards (<a href=\"mailto:bedwards@whoi.edu\">bedwards@whoi.edu<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=182504&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192529\">Sample list, experiments 1-5 (Excel file)<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205544&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192529\">Sample list, experiments 6 &amp; 7 (Excel file)<\/a>\n<strong>1.\u00a0 Diatom cultures exposed to H<sub>2<\/sub>O<sub>2<br \/>\n<\/sub><\/strong>Oxylipin analysis: Samples from: Kim Thamatrakoln \/ Kay Bidle (Rutgers), extracted and analyzed by Helen Fredricks. 5 cultures: T pseudonana, C socialis, C tenuissimus 2-10, C tenuissimus 2-6, C lorenzianus: Each exposed to 0, 30, 150 \u03bcM H<sub>2<\/sub>O<sub>2<\/sub>\n<strong>2.\u00a0 Pheaodactylum tricornutum culture exposed to H<sub>2<\/sub>O<sub>2<\/sub><br \/>\n<\/strong>Oxylipin analysis: Samples from Assaf Vardi group, Weizmann Institute of Plant Sciences, extracted by Jeremy Tagliaferre, analyzed and processed by Helen Fredricks.\n<p>Phaeodactylum tricornutum culture exposed to H<sub>2<\/sub>O<sub>2<\/sub> at 0, 30 and 150 uM concentrations, samples collected at 4, 8 and 24 hour intervals. In duplicate.<\/p>\n<strong>3.\u00a0 Chaetoceros infected with DNA and RNA viruses<br \/>\n<\/strong>Lipid analysis: Samples from: Kim Thamatrakoln \/ Kay Bidle (Rutgers), extracted by Jeremy Tagliaferre, analyzed and processed by Helen Fredricks. All samples were analyzed on the LCQ, a single replicate from each day\/treatment was analysed on the Exactive to give high res. data.\n<p>Chaetoceros strains 2-6 and 2-10 exposed to a DNA and a RNA virus. Samples for lipid analysis taken at ~ 1, 3, 5, 7 days. More details in the &#8220;Chaetoceros&#8221; sheets of the &#8216;sample list&#8217; excel file.<\/p>\n<strong>4.\u00a0 Emiliania Huxleyi strains grown at different calcium concentrations<br \/>\n<\/strong>Lipid analysis. Samples from Chris Johns \/ Kay Bidle, Rutgers. Samples extracted by Jeremy Taglaferre \/ Oliver Newman analysed and processed by Helen Fredricks.\n<p>Emiliania huxleyi strains 374, 607, 611, 624 and 659 grown at 0.1 and 10 mMol calcium. LCQ \/ ion trap data files provide low res. data.<\/p>\n<strong>5.\u00a0 Viral infection of Emiliania huxleyi<br \/>\n<\/strong>A post-doc in Rutger&#8217;s Bidle lab group, Jozef Nissimov has made a couple of visits to the Van Mooy lab to extract and run samples. Samples analyzed by Helen Fredricks and Jozef Nissimov. LCQ ion trap samples provide low resolution MS and MS\/MS data in positive and negative ion modes.\n<strong>6.\u00a0 PS1312- Research cruise in June\/July 2013 in the upwelling region of coastal California<br \/>\n<em>a.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Water Column Oxylipin Distribution<br \/>\n<\/em><\/strong>Particulate Lipid samples were collected by filtering 1L of seawater from 6 depth at 8 stations onto a 0.2 um Durapore filter. Lipids were extracted from the filters back in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer (1959) protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were collected at 2 depths (Chl max and the 55% PAR) at 8 stations along the cruise track by pre-filtering SW through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Then, approximately 200ml of filtrate were extracted onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters HBL). SPE cartridges were stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep). Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.\n<em><strong>b.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Oxylipin Distributions in Sinking Particles<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/em>From the four traps deployed over 6-12 hours at 50m depth, particulate lipid samples were collected by filtering one-500 ml split of trap material onto a 0.2um Durapore filter. Lipids were extracted from the filters back in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were collected from the four net traps as well by pre-filtering SW through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Then, approximately 200ml of filtrate were extracted onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters HBL). SPE cartridges were stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep). Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.\n<em><strong>c.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Oxylipin Incubation Experiments<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/em>On-deck incubation experiments were conducted by incubating 20L of whole seawater collected from the 55% PAR depth horizon in the presence of various oxylipin compounds at a range of concentrations in triplicate (see Table ). The purpose of the experiment was to determine the response of natural surface ocean free-living microbial communities to various oxylipins and oxylipin concentrations. After 24 hours of incubation at 55% PAR and in situ temperature the triplicate incubations were harvested. Samples were collected for enzyme activity, particulate and dissolved lipidome, biomass, BSi, dSi, SRP, silicification rates, and viral counts.\n<table border=\"1\" rules=\"none\" cellpadding=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Experiment<\/td>\n<td>Treatment #<\/td>\n<td>Treatment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I1<\/td>\n<td>1-3<\/td>\n<td>Control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I1<\/td>\n<td>4-6<\/td>\n<td>0.1 \u00b5M PUA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I1<\/td>\n<td>7-9<\/td>\n<td>1 \u00b5M PUA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I1<\/td>\n<td>10-12<\/td>\n<td>10 \u00b5M PUA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I2<\/td>\n<td>1-3<\/td>\n<td>Control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I2<\/td>\n<td>4-6<\/td>\n<td>0.1 \u00b5M ARA mix<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I2<\/td>\n<td>7-9<\/td>\n<td>1 \u00b5M ARA mix<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I2<\/td>\n<td>10-12<\/td>\n<td>10 \u00b5M ARA mix<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I3<\/td>\n<td>1-3<\/td>\n<td>Control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I3<\/td>\n<td>4-6<\/td>\n<td>0.1 \u00b5M ARA mix<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>I3<\/td>\n<td>7-9<\/td>\n<td>1 \u00b5M ARA mix<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">PUA= heptadienal, octadienal, and decadienal<br \/>\nARA mix= 70% Arachidonic acid, 30% hydroperoxy-eicosatetraenoic acid<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Particulate Lipid samples were collected by filtering 1L of seawater from each triplicate onto a 0.2 um Durapore filter. Lipids were extracted from the filters back in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer (1959) protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were collected by\u00a0 pre-filtering 1 L of each triplicate through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Then, approximately 200ml of filtrate were extracted onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters HBL). SPE cartridges were stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep). Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.<\/p>\n<em><strong>d.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Nutrient Amendment experiment<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/em>An on-deck nutrient amendment incubation experiment was conducted to determine how the oxylipin profile of natural phytoplankton populations changes under nutrient stress. Whole seawater was collected from the 55% PAR depth horizon and incubated in triplicate under three different conditions: Control (ambient nutrient stress), +NP (simulated Si stress), and +NPSi (replete). After a 72 hour incubation period, samples were collected for the dissolved and particulate lipidome, biomass, enzyme activity, and nutrients.\n<table border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Treatment #<\/td>\n<td>Treatment<\/td>\n<td>Nutrient State<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>N1-N3<\/td>\n<td>Control<\/td>\n<td>Ambient nutrient stress<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>N4-N6<\/td>\n<td>+NP<\/td>\n<td>Stimulated Si stress<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>N7-N9<\/td>\n<td>+NPSi<\/td>\n<td>Replete<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Particulate Lipid samples were collected by filtering 1L of seawater from each triplicate onto a 0.2 um Durapore filter. Lipids were extracted from the filters back in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer (1959) protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were collected by\u00a0 pre-filtering 1 L of each triplicate through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Then, approximately 200ml of filtrate were extracted onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters HBL). SPE cartridges were stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep). Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.<\/p>\n<strong>7.\u00a0 Collaborations with Matt Johnson<br \/>\n<em>a.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Impacts of growth phase and Si stress on the lipidome of diatom cultures<br \/>\n<\/em><\/strong>Culture experiments were conducted to determine how the lipidome of various diatoms shifts with growth phase and Si stress. The particulate and dissolved lipidomes were sampled from cultures of three diatoms isolated from the PS1312 (MJSUR 06, MJSUR12, MJSUR15) and three model diatom species (<em>Chaetoceros socialis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana<\/em>) during exponential growth, stationary phase, and Si-limitation (except Pt which does not have a Si requirement).\n<p>Particulate Lipid samples were collected by filtering 200 mL of seawater from each triplicate onto a 0.2 um Durapore filter. Lipids were extracted from the filters back in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer (1959) protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were collected by\u00a0 pre-filtering 200 mL of each triplicate through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Then, the 200ml filtrate was extracted onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters HBL). SPE cartridges were stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep). Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.<\/p>\n<em>b.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0PtNOA grazing experimen<\/em>t<br \/>\nSamples were collected for complete lipidome analysis from WT <em>Phaeodactylum tricornutum<\/em> and PtNOA cultures with and without the grazer <em>Oxhyrris marina<\/em>at t=2 hrs and t=final over a six hour grazing experiment. The purpose of the experiment was to determine how the lipidome changes under general stress vs. under grazing pressure. Particulate lipid samples were collected by filtering 200 ml of each treatment onto 0.2 \u00b5m Durapore filters. The filters were stored at -80\u02daC and extracted in the lab using a modified Bligh and Dyer (1959) lipid extraction protocol (Popendorf et al. 2013). DNP-PE was added as an internal standard during extraction. Samples for dissolved lipids were pre-filtered through a 0.2 um sterivex filter to remove particulates. Benzaldehyde was added to the filtrate as an internal standard (10uM). Dissolved lipids were then extracted onto a solid phase extraction cartridge (Waters HBL) and stored at -80C until elution and mass spec analysis (Edwards, in prep).\u00a0 Samples were analyzed using a two different reverse phase HPLC\u00a0 methods paired with high resolution, accurate mass (HRAM) data from a Thermo Q Exactive mass spectrometer (&lt;2 ppm)\u00a0 adapted from Hummel et al. (2011). For quantification of free fatty acids, oxylipins, and intact polar lipid, electrospray ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C8 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and a starting gradient of 55% water 45% 70:30 ACN:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 ACN:IPA over 26 minutes with a 5 min equilibrations period. To optimize for the quantification of polyunsaturated aldehydes, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-HRAM was paired with a reverse phase chromatographic method using a C18 column (Agilent) as the stationary phase and starting gradient of 80% water 20% 70:30 Methanol:IPA increasing to 1% water 99% 70:30 Methanol:IPA over 26 minutes with a 10 min equilibration period.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>\n\n<p>The particulate and dissolved lipidomes are now being annotated in the software package, Metabolic Analysis and Visualization ENgine (MAVEN,) that detects peaks and facilitates pseudo-targeted lipidomics analysis (Melamud et al., 2010; Collins et al. in prep). Identities are assigned to individual peaks by querying a lipid database that Helen Fredricks populated with IPLs, FA, oxylipins, pigments, and sterols. The ability to assign ID based on m\/z hinges on the high mass resolution afforded to us by the Thermo Q Exactive mass spec.<\/p>\n\n<p>Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. <em>Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. <\/em>37:911-917.<\/p>\n<p>Collins JR et al. in prep. Pseudo-targeted lipidomics analysis of cultured marine microbes and natural marine microbial communities.<\/p>\n<p>Edwards BR et al. in prep. A Novel Method for the Extraction and Quantification of Particulate and Dissolved Oxylipins from Marine Environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\nRelated Files:<br \/>\n\u00bb <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=182504&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192529\">Sample list, experiments 1-5<\/a><br \/>\n\u00bb <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205544&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192529\">Sample list, experiments 6 &amp; 7<\/a>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>E. Huxleyi haploid \/ diploid + virus<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Jonathan E. Hunter\u2020<sup>1,2<\/sup>, Miguel J. Frada<sup>3<\/sup>, Helen F. Fredricks<sup>4<\/sup>, Assaf Vardi<sup>3<\/sup> and Benjamin Van Mooy<sup>4<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>1. Ocean &amp; Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom<\/p>\n<p>2. Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom<\/p>\n<p>3. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel<\/p>\n<p>4. Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 02543, United States of America.<\/p>\n<p>\u2020Corresponding Author: J.Hunter@soton.ac.uk; Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.<\/p>\n\n<p>Marine viruses that infect phytoplankton strongly influence the ecology and evolution of their hosts. <i>Emiliania huxleyi <\/i>is characterized by a biphasic life cycle composed of a diploid (2N) and haploid (1N) phase; diploid cells are susceptible to infection by specific coccolithoviruses, yet haploid cells are resistant. Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) play a role during infection, but their molecular distribution in haploid cells is unknown. We present mass spectrometric analyses of lipids from cultures of uninfected diploid, infected diploid, and uninfected haploid <i>E. huxleyi<\/i>. Known viral GSLs were present in the infected diploid cultures as expected, but surprisingly, trace amounts of viral GSLs were also detected in the uninfected haploid cells. Sialic-acid GSLs have been linked to viral susceptibility in diploid cells, but were found to be absent in the haploid cultures, suggesting a mechanism of haploid resistance to infection. Additional untargeted high-resolution mass spectrometry data processed via multivariate analysis unveiled a number of novel biomarkers of infected, non-infected, and haploid cells. These data expand our understanding on the dynamics of lipid metabolism during <i>E.<\/i> <i>huxleyi <\/i>host\/virus interactions and highlight potential novel biomarkers for infection, susceptibility, and ploidy.<\/p>\n\n<p><b>Sample:<\/b> Total lipid extract obtained following a modified Bligh &amp; Dyer protocol. BHT (butylated hydroxyl toluene) added as an antioxidant, DNP-PE added as an internal std (dinitrophenylphosphatidylethanolamine, Avanti polar lipids).<\/p>\n<p><b>LCQ data:<\/b> Analyzed on Thermo LCQ Fleet ion-trap mass spectrometer (electrospray ionization) coupled to an Agilent 1100 HPLC. Chromatography follows Popendorf et al: Popendorf, K.J., Fredricks, H.F., and Van Mooy, B.A.S.\u00a0(2013) Molecular-ion independent quantitation of intact polar diacylglycerolipids in marine plankton using triple quadrupole MS. <em>Lipids <\/em><strong>48<\/strong>: 185-195; <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/s11745-012-3748-0\">doi:10.1007\/s11745-012-3748-0<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Exactive Plus data:<\/b> Analyzed on Thermo Exactive plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (electrospray ionization) coupled to an Agilent 1200 HPLC. Chromatography follows Hummel et al: 2011 Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Plant Lipids. <em>Front. Plant Sci.<\/em> <strong>2<\/strong>: 54. <a href=\"http:\/\/journal.frontiersin.org\/article\/10.3389\/fpls.2011.00054\/abstract\">doi:10.3389\/fpls.2011.00054<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Raw data<\/b> is presented as .raw files from Xcalibur 2.2 software (ThermoScientific). Conversion utilities are available on the web which will convert .raw files to a more accessible format like .mzXML<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-1\">Bidle Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-1\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>Infochemicals<\/h3>\n<p>Excel files:<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205784&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">2014_659,611,374_BasalNO.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205785&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">2014_1516, 373, 379, 607_BasalNO workbook .xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205745&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">2014_1516_NOdonorTreatments.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205786&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">20130916 Ehux379-EhV86 Infection.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205765&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">20131120 Ehux1516-EhV86 Infection.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205787&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">BSiDSiData_DYEatomCruise_30Mar15.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205788&amp;pt=2&amp;p=213749\">EhuxEhV_InfectionDynamicsGSL-SPT_30Mar15.xlsx<\/a>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>PIC cellular quotas<\/h3>\n\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>SSC Signatures<\/h3>\n<p>Analysis of side-scatter (SSC) for E huxleyi strains<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-2\">Johnson Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-2\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>Grazing Experiments<\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Description of files: Results from several grazing experiments using various strains of <em>Emiliania huxleyi <\/em>and the predator <em>Oxyrrhis marina<\/em> or <em>Protoperidinium<\/em> sp. Also results from experiments comparing the growth of haploid and diploid <em>E. huxleyi <\/em>under different nutrient conditions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Elizabeth Harvey and Matthew Johnson<\/p>\nFiles:<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181624&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">funcres_374oxy.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181644&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">funcres_624oxy.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181664&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">guava_scope_compare.xls<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181645&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">hapdim_nutrients.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181646&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">oxygraze_strains.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181647&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\">protograze_strains.xlsx<br \/>\n<\/a>\n<hr \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181647&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192029\"><br \/>\n<\/a>\nFile: 010213_nitric oxide grazing <br \/>\n<strong>About:<\/strong>\u00a0 An experiment to look at the role of nitric oxide on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors:<\/strong> Johnson, MD; Vardi, A<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 070513_grazing (Cten_log_v_stat)<br \/>\n<strong>About:<\/strong> A grazing experiment to look at the role of growth state on grazing rates; using Chaetoceros tenuissimus as prey and Oxyrrhis marina as predator\n<p><strong>Authors:<\/strong> Johnson, MD; Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 100813_grazing_(Pt_log_v_stat)<br \/>\n<strong>About:<\/strong> A grazing experiment to look at the role of prey growth state and predator infochemicals on grazing rates; using Phaeodactylum tricornutum as prey and Oxyrrhis marina as predator\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD; Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 103013_Pt (stat)_grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About:<\/strong> A grazing experiment to look at the functional response of Oxyrrhis marina on a range of Phaeodactylum tricornutum concentrations (stationary phase)\n<p><strong>Authors:<\/strong> Johnson, MD; Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 031714_DD grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 040714_DD grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 041014_DD grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 041614_DD grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 042814_DD grazing<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 051914_DD_grazing_PtNOA<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on a transgenic clone of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum (PtNOA)\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD,\u00a0 Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 052114_DD_grazing_PtNOA<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on a transgenic clone of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum (PtNOA)\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 052914_DD_grazing_PtNOA<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 2,4-decadienal (DD) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on a transgenic clone of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum (PtNOA)\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 060414_leukB4<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>:\u00a0 An experiment to look at the role of Leukotriene B4 (LB4) on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 071514_15(s)-HpETE<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 15(s)-HpETE on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n<hr \/>\nFile: 072214_15(s)-HpETE<br \/>\n<strong>About<\/strong>: An experiment to look at the role of 15(s)-HpETE on grazing by Oxyrrhis marina on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum\n<p><strong>Authors<\/strong>: Johnson, MD, Beaudoin, D<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-3\">Mincer Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-3\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>Pseudoalteromonas Mass Spectra<\/h3>\n<p>This folder contains mass spectra of extracellular extracts of several Pseudoalteromonas strains.<\/p>\n<p>Extracts profiled using Agilent HPLC 1260 coupled to time of flight mass spectrometer with ESI source (Agilent Technologies, ToF LC\/MS 6230). All samples run in positive and negative ionization mode.<\/p>\n<p>Files are available at this ftp site:<\/p>\n\n<p>For details on extraction methods and mass spectrometer settings see:<\/p>\n<p>Whalen, Kristen E., Kelsey L. Poulson-Ellestad, Robert W. Deering, David C. Rowley, and Tracy J. Mincer, 2015.\u00a0 Enhancement of Antibiotic Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria by the Efflux Pump Inhibitor 3,4-Dibromopyrrole-2,5-Dione Isolated from a Pseudoalteromonas Sp. <em>Journal of Natural Products<\/em> <strong>78<\/strong>(3) 402-12. <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.acs.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1021\/np500775e\">10.1021\/np500775e<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<h3>E. Huxleyi mass spectra<\/h3>\nThis folder contains mass spectra of extracellular extracts of four strains of Emiliania huxelyi exposed to the protist grazer Oxyrrhis marina. Different concentrations of each E. huxlyei strain was grazed by O. marina for 48h,(n = 2-3 per E. huxleyi concentration).\u00a0 Treatments also included E. huxleyi Alone and O. marina Alone, as well as filtered seawater blanks<br \/>\nFiltrates were collected at T = 0h and 48h.\nTo remove cells, 80 mL of culture was spun at 3000 rpm for 10min, then filtered under gentle vacuum using GF\/F filters.\u00a0 Filtrates extracted using Waters HLB solid phase extraction cartridge (200mg\/6mL; Waters Corp.) with the following SPE method:<br \/>\nFlow rate approx. 1 mL\/min<br \/>\nConditioning: 3 mL methanol followed by 3 mL ethyl acetate<br \/>\nEquilibration: 3 mL water<br \/>\nLoad: 80 mL filtrate<br \/>\nWash: 4 mL water<br \/>\nElution: 2 mL methanol followed by 2 mL ethyl acetate, repeated once (8 mL final volume)<br \/>\nEluent (i.e. extracts) collected, dried under vacuum\n<p>Extracts profiled using Agilent HPLC 1260 coupled to time of flight mass spectrometer with ESI source (Agilent Technologies, ToF LC\/MS 6230). All samples run in positive ionization mode.<\/p>\n<p>Samples re-dissolved in 95:5 water\/methanol, at concentrations normalized to final E. huxleyi cell abundance for each stain (except strain 379, samples were reconstituted and normalized to final volume extracted, i.e., 80 mL eq.)<\/p>\n<p>Extracts of &#8220;grazer only&#8221; controls were reconstituted at equivalent cell concentrations. Seawater only controls were reconstituted to the same concentration factor as the most concentrated grazed E. huxleyi samples.<\/p>\nHPLC solvents were solvent A: methanol 0.1% formic acid and Solvent B: water 0.1% formic acid.<br \/>\nThe following was used as the HPLC solvent scheme: Held at 5% methanol for 5 min, ramp to 40% methanol over 5 min and hold at 40% for 2 minutes. Then ramp to 95% methanol over 5 minutes, hold at 95% methanol for 3 minutes, drop to 5% methanol and hold for 3 minutes.\u00a0 First two minutes dumped into waste to avoid salt contamination in the mass spec.\n<p>Column: Phenomenex C18, 150&#215;2.1mm; 2.6 um particle size; column temperature held at 35 *C during run.<\/p>\nMass spectrometer settings:<br \/>\nPositive ionization mode<br \/>\nGas Temp: 350 *C<br \/>\nDrying gas: 8 L\/min<br \/>\nNebulizer: 40 psig<br \/>\nSheath gas: 350 *C<br \/>\nSheath gas flow: 10 L\/min<br \/>\nCapillary voltage: 3500V<br \/>\nNozzle voltage: 1000V<br \/>\nAcquisition: 20- 3000 m\/z<br \/>\nReference mass calibrant used: 121.0509 m\/z and 922.0098 m\/z\n<p>See read me file within each E. huxelyi strain folder for information on mass spectra files nomenclature.<\/p>\n<p>Files are available at this ftp site:<\/p>\n\n\n<h3>C10 September<\/h3>\nThis folder contains mass spectra of extracellular extracts of Chaetoceros tenuissimus exposed to the protist grazer Oxyrrhis marina. C. tenuissimus was grown to different growth stages, specifically log (&#8220;L1-3&#8221;) and stationary (&#8220;S1-3&#8221;) growth phases before exposed to O. marina (n = 3). One treatment also included C. tenuissimus exposed to filtrate of O. marina only (&#8220;SF&#8221;). Filtrates of the now grazed diatoms (and media-only controls (&#8220;log BLK&#8221; and &#8220;STA blk&#8221;)) were collected at T = 0, 2 and 4 days, frozen and then extracted using ABN column (30mg\/mL; Biotage) with the following SPE method:<br \/>\nConditioning: 1 mL methanol<br \/>\nEquilibration: 1 mL water, 0.1% formic acid<br \/>\nLoad: 10 mL filtrate<br \/>\nWash: 1 mL 95:5 water\/methanol<br \/>\nElution: 1 mL 95:5 methanol\/water<br \/>\nEluent (i.e. extracts) collected, dried under vacuum\n<p>Extracts profiled using Agilent HPLC 1260 coupled to time of flight mass spectrometer with ESI source (Agilent Technologies, ToF LC\/MS 6230). All samples run in positive ion mode.<\/p>\n<p>Samples re-dissolved in 20 uL of methanol then diluted 1:10 in methanol. For each sample, 15 uL were injected. HPLC solvents were solvent A: acetonitrile 0.1% formic acid and Solvent B: water 0.1% formic acid.\u00a0 The following was used as the HPLC solvent scheme: 0-5.0 min hold at 5% A, 95% B; 5.1-10.0 min ramp to 40% A, 60% B; 10.1-12.00 min hold at 40% A, 60% B;12.1-17.0 min ramp to 95% A, 5% B; 17.1-24.0 min hold at 95% A, 5 % B; 24-24.1 drop to 5% A, 95% B; 24.1-28.0 min hold at 5% A; 95% B.<\/p>\n<p>Column: Phenomenex C18, 150&#215;4.6mm; 2.6 um particle size; column temperature held at 40 *C during run.<\/p>\nMass spectrometer settings:<br \/>\nGas Temp: 350 *C<br \/>\nDrying gas: 8 L\/min<br \/>\nNebulizer: 40 psig<br \/>\nSheath gas: 350 *C<br \/>\nSheath gas flow: 10 L\/min<br \/>\nCapillary voltage: 3500V<br \/>\nNozzle voltage: 1000V<br \/>\nAcquisition: 20- 3000 m\/z<br \/>\nReference mass calibrant used: 121.0509 m\/z and 922.0098 m\/z\n\n<h3>Pt September 2013<\/h3>\nThis folder contains mass spectra of extracellular extracts of Phaeodactylum tricornutum exposed to the protist grazer Oxyrrhis marina. P. tricornutum was grown to different growth stages, specifically log (&#8220;Log1-3&#8221;) and stationary (&#8220;STA1-3&#8221;) growth phases before exposed to O. marina (n = 3). One treatment also included P. tricornutum exposed to filtrate of O. marina only (&#8220;STA filt&#8221;). Filtrates of the now grazed diatoms (and media-only controls (&#8220;log BLK&#8221; and &#8220;STA blk&#8221;)) were collected at T = 0, 2 and 4 days, frozen and then extracted using ABN column (30mg\/mL; Biotage) with the following SPE method:<br \/>\nConditioning: 1 mL methanol<br \/>\nEquilibration: 1 mL water, 0.1% formic acid<br \/>\nLoad: 10 mL filtrate<br \/>\nWash: 1 mL 95:5 water\/methanol<br \/>\nElution: 1 mL 95:5 methanol\/water<br \/>\nEluent (i.e. extracts) collected, dried under vacuumExtracts profiled using Agilent HPLC 1260 coupled to time of flight mass spectrometer with ESI source (Agilent Technologies, ToF LC\/MS 6230). All samples run in positive ion mode.\n<p>Samples re-dissolved in 20 uL of methanol then diluted 1:10 in methanol. For each sample, 15 uL were injected. HPLC solvents were solvent A: acetonitrile 0.1% formic acid and Solvent B: water 0.1% formic acid.\u00a0 The following was used as the HPLC solvent scheme: 0-5.0 min hold at 5% A, 95% B; 5.1-10.0 min ramp to 40% A, 60% B; 10.1-12.00 min hold at 40% A, 60% B;12.1-17.0 min ramp to 95% A, 5% B; 17.1-24.0 min hold at 95% A, 5 % B; 24-24.1 drop to 5% A, 95% B; 24.1-28.0 min hold at 5% A; 95% B.<\/p>\n<p>Column: Phenomenex C18, 150&#215;4.6mm; 2.6 um particle size; column temperature held at 40 *C during run.<\/p>\nMass spectrometer settings:<br \/>\nGas Temp: 350 *C<br \/>\nDrying gas: 8 L\/min<br \/>\nNebulizer: 40 psig<br \/>\nSheath gas: 350 *C<br \/>\nSheath gas flow: 10 L\/min<br \/>\nCapillary voltage: 3500V<br \/>\nNozzle voltage: 1000V<br \/>\nAcquisition: 20- 3000 m\/z<br \/>\nReference mass calibrant used: 121.0509 m\/z and 922.0098 m\/z\nFiles are available at this ftp site:<br \/>\n<a href=\"ftp:\/\/ftp.whoi.edu\/pub\/science\/MCG\/gbmf\/Mincer\/Pt_September2013\">ftp:\/\/ftp.whoi.edu\/pub\/science\/MCG\/gbmf\/Mincer\/Pt_September2013<\/a>\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--label-4\">Vardi Lab<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"#\" id=\"fl-accordion--icon-4\"><i>Expand<\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<h3>The role of autophagy in P-limitationFile authors: Adva Shemi and Daniella Schatz<\/h3>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181384&amp;pt=10&amp;p=105233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ehux P starvation &#8211; cell count and AP.xlsx<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181404&amp;pt=10&amp;p=105233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ehux P starvation &#8211; lipid analysis.xlsx<br \/>\n<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205664&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192049\">Ehux P limitation &#8211; gene expression March 2015.xlsx<\/a>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>The life cycle strategies in coccolithophores<\/h3>\nFile author: Miguel Frada<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181424&amp;pt=10&amp;p=105233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Sphingolipids-exp.pptx<\/a>2)\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205644&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192050\">Emiliania huxleyi RCC1216<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205644&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192050\"> infecte<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205644&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192050\">d<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205644&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192050\"> with EhV201 (Excel file)<\/a>.<br \/>\nCultures were sampled daily for gene expression analysis (qPCR) of haploid or meiosis specific geneselated genes.<br \/>\nAll data generated by Miguel Frada.\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>Oxylipin production in diatoms during oxidative stress<\/h3>\nFile authors: Daniella Schatz and Shiri Graff<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181405&amp;pt=10&amp;p=105233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Pt for oxylipins.xlsx<\/a>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>Redox sensing (roGFP) in diatoms<\/h3>\nFile authors: Daniella Schatz and Shiri Graff<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=181444&amp;pt=10&amp;p=105233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Tp roGFP initial scan.xlsx<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.whoi.edu\/fileserver.do?id=205684&amp;pt=2&amp;p=192069\">Tp roGFP oxidative stress March 2015.xlsx<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Project Data Microscale mechanistic linkages between the chemical and physical processes that contribute to marine organic matter degradation. 2015 &#8211; present. Abstract Collapse Particulate organic matter (POM) is ubiquitous in marine systems, and its role in the global carbon cycle is defined by microscale interactions between POM and microbes (Jackson,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":77,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/310"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/77"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":493,"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/310\/revisions\/493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.whoi.edu\/staff\/bvanmooy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}